Prepared for Cardiovascular Consultants, P.C. · 2026 Strategy Review · Confidential — not for distribution
Cardiovascular Service Line Performance & Optimization · Munster · Hammond · Crown Point

A Scalable, Profitable Remote Care Service Line
for Cardiovascular Consultants.

How Northwest Indiana's independent cardiology group converts the Medicare panel it already manages — heart failure, coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, and hypertension — into a continuously monitored remote care service line with recurring reimbursement, margin-positive before any value-based dollar. Powered by CoachCare.

$0
24-Month Net Reimbursement
$0
24-Month Practice Margin
0
Hospitalizations Avoided
0
Unique Patients in Active Remote Care (Month 24)
Independent · Full-Spectrum · Built Out — Except One Layer

2026 Starts From a Position of Strength

Cardiovascular Consultants already runs nearly every piece of a modern cardiovascular practice. Seven cardiologists and three advanced practice providers cover interventional, structural-heart evaluation, diagnostics, and chronic cardiac clinics across three offices and seven satellite communities. What the public footprint shows no trace of is the one layer Medicare now pays for month after month: a chronic remote care program.

✓ In place

Full-Spectrum Cardiology

Interventional coronary, peripheral, and carotid work; left atrial appendage (LAA) closure procedures; evaluation for TAVR and mitral clip — the procedural franchise is already built.

✓ In place

Connected Diagnostics Today

Holter and mobile cardiac telemetry, echo, vascular and nuclear imaging, pacemaker/defibrillator checks — the practice already consumes device data every day. The chronic monitoring layer is the natural extension.

✓ In place

Chronic Cardiac Clinics

A coumadin management clinic and a lipid clinic — standing longitudinal programs whose patients are exactly the RPM and PCM enrollment funnel.

✓ Verified

Digital Front Door Live

The FollowMyHealth patient portal — a Veradigm product — is already in patients' hands, corroborating the practice's Veradigm EMR environment. Patients are already digital; monitoring is the next step.

Three offices — Munster, Hammond, Crown Point — plus satellite reach into DeMotte, Dyer, East Chicago, Lake Station, Portage, Whiting, and Winfield. And in that entire footprint, no remote patient monitoring, chronic care management, or principal care management program is marketed anywhere today. That whitespace is the opportunity on this page.

The 2026 Window

Why 2026 Is the Year to Build It

Three forces converge this year: Medicare's remote-care billing framework just got broader, readmissions still carry real financial consequences for the hospitals that depend on this practice, and — unusually — there is no downside clock running. The timing is pure upside.

CY2026 Tailwind
99445 · 99470

Short-Window RPM Is Now Billable

New CY2026 codes 99445 (2–15-day device supply) and 99470 (first 10 minutes of management) remove the 16-day floor that previously blocked episodic monitoring — making post-procedure recovery windows after LAA-closure and other interventions cleanly billable for the first time.

Referral Defense
30 Days

Readmissions Still Carry a Price

Medicare's readmission penalty program still bites the area hospitals this practice works with every day. The cardiology group whose heart failure patients don't bounce back inside 30 days becomes the group every discharge planner wants on the chart — a referral-relationship asset no competitor in the market currently holds.

$0 at Risk

No Downside Clock

The practice carries no mandatory model exposure — pure-upside timing, and prepared if selection maps change. Every dollar in the forecast below is fee-for-service reimbursement for care the practice controls, with nothing owed back to CMS under any scenario.

Heart Failure
Coronary Artery Disease
Atrial Fibrillation
Hypertension
The Operating Model

One Service Line, Powered by an Engine You Don't Have to Build

A named service line with its own P&L, rather than a point solution bolted onto one condition, following the cardiac patient from discharge to long-term stability. The practice already runs connected-monitoring workflows for Holter and device checks; this is the partner model that adds the chronic layer without adding headcount.

The Clinical Stack — TCM → RPM → PCM
  • TCM Structured 30-day post-discharge management (99495/99496) — the billable bridge from the hospital to the clinic for heart failure and post-procedure patients.
  • RPM Device-based physiologic monitoring (weight, blood pressure, pulse ox) — the continuous early-warning and GDMT-titration layer across the HF, CAD, AFib, and hypertension panels.
  • PCM Principal Care Management (99426/99427) — the care-management wrapper for the condition this practice actually owns: resistant hypertension, coronary disease, heart failure, or cardiovascular disease as a single domain.
The Engine — Operated by CoachCare
  • Enroll An on-site enrollment specialist — staffed at CoachCare's expense — plus physician-referral and telephonic outreach pathways.
  • Monitor Cellular devices shipped and supported; 24/7 alert triage; clinical monitoring staff handling readings, outreach, and documentation.
  • Document Time-stamped, audit-ready care logs flowing into the practice's Veradigm environment.
  • Bill Claims-ready output for every eligible patient, every month — the practice bills, the practice keeps the margin.
Why PCM, not CCM: a specialist's care management is focused on one principal condition — resistant hypertension, coronary disease, heart failure — or on cardiovascular disease as a single domain, which is precisely what Principal Care Management is written for. Chronic Care Management assumes management of all of a patient's conditions, and it is increasingly billed by the patient's primary care practice, or absorbed into a prospective payment there. PCM is the code that fits the specialist's actual scope and does not collide with the PCP's.
The one coordination rule: each patient gets one longitudinal care-management wrapper — PCM on the principal cardiac condition — while RPM stacks with it and TCM owns the 30 days after every discharge. One enrollment decision per patient, set in protocol.

The CY2026 Billing Stack — Priced for Munster

ServiceCodesCY2026 Rate (IN Locality)Cardiovascular Use
Transitional Care Management99495 · 99496~$200 / ~$280*Every HF and post-procedure discharge
RPM device supply99454 · 99445 (new)$48.15/mo99445 unlocks 2–15-day post-procedure windows*
RPM treatment management99457 · 99458 · 99470 (new)$48.89 + $39.29 add'lMonthly review, GDMT titration, escalation
Principal Care Management99426 · 99427$64.26 + $51.15 add'lThe principal cardiac condition — HF, CAD, resistant HTN — ≥3 months

Dollar rates are CY2026 Medicare values for the Indiana statewide locality (zip 46321 — Munster is priced at Indiana rates, not Chicago's). *Asterisked figures are national magnitudes for codes outside the modeled economics; TCM and the new 2026 codes are not in the forecast below — they are upside on top of it.

One Build, Four Returns

The Value Layers, In Order

The forecast below stands on its own P&L — everything after the first layer is additional return on infrastructure the service line has already paid for.

1 · A Standalone Recurring P&L
The lead story is the simplest one: $2.28M in modeled 24-month net reimbursement, $971,484 of practice margin after all CoachCare fees, at a 42.6% margin — recurring, subscription-like revenue from the panel the practice already manages, margin-positive from month two, with no negative-margin quarter. No value-based contract required.
2 · Avoided Cost & Referral Defense
~113 modeled hospitalizations avoided over 24 months — roughly $1.70M in acute-care cost at $15K per admission. Continuous HF surveillance is what keeps patients out of the 30-day window that readmission penalties still price for area hospitals — making this practice the discharge-referral partner of choice against employed and competing groups.
3 · Procedural Throughput
Remote recovery surveillance supports earlier, confident discharge after LAA-closure procedures and keeps the TAVR- and mitral-clip-evaluation funnel warm and monitored between visits — protecting and growing the procedural franchise that anchors the practice.
4 · Modernized Clinics as Enrollment Funnels
The Holter/MCT service, the pacemaker/defibrillator check clinic, and the coumadin clinic are ready-made enrollment funnels: patients already sending the practice data episodically convert naturally to continuous RPM, and INR-managed patients are a documented chronic-management population from day of consent.
5 · The Hypertension & RDN Whitespace
A resistant-hypertension RPM panel is the substrate for renal denervation readiness — structured BP monitoring identifies and documents the refractory patients who become RDN evaluation candidates as coverage matures. No group in the market visibly runs this panel today; the first mover owns the funnel.
In the System You Already Use

Integrated With Your Veradigm Environment

The practice's Veradigm EMR — already corroborated by the FollowMyHealth patient portal your patients use today — is a supported CoachCare integration. Enrollment, vitals, documentation, and billing-ready output flow between the two systems so the program lives where your clinicians already work. The integration's setup and maintenance costs are already inside the fee lines of the forecast below.

Veradigm The practice's EMR environment One chart, one workflow Orders & enrollment flags Vitals & care documentation FollowMyHealth portal Billing workflow CoachCare Remote care platform Cellular devices 24/7 monitoring Health coaches Enrollment team Billing engine FROM VERADIGM Enrollment flags & candidate lists Patient health history BACK INTO VERADIGM Discrete vitals — data, not PDFs Care summary & compliance documentation Real-time enrollment status Claims-ready billing output, every patient, every month Clinicians stay in their own workflow — the program lives alongside the chart they already use

Already in the model

Veradigm integration setup and monthly maintenance are inside the month-1 economics and the fee lines of the forecast — no hidden IT project.

Confirmed in contracting

The integration is scoped to the practice's exact Veradigm product during contracting — a configuration step, not a discovery risk.

CoachCare Value Analysis · Modeled for Cardiovascular Consultants, P.C.

The Value Analysis

A 24-month forecast built on this practice's own parameters: an estimated ~4,000-patient Medicare panel, 10 referring providers, one on-site enrollment specialist, Veradigm integration, and CY2026 Medicare rates auto-resolved for zip 46321 (Indiana statewide locality). The service line is RPM + PCM — physiologic monitoring plus Principal Care Management on the principal cardiac condition. Avoided-readmission savings, TCM, and the new 2026 short-window codes are not in these numbers — they are upside on top.

Active Program Enrollments Under Remote Care

Monthly active enrollments by program — not unique patients; a patient carrying both RPM and PCM is counted in each. Physician referrals (5/provider/mo, 70% acceptance) + 1 on-site enrollment specialist (80/mo) + telephonic outreach, net of discharges · RPM caps at 1,050 (M16); PCM runs to ~677 of a 1,020 ceiling by month 24.

Monthly Economics — Revenue, Fees, Margin

Net reimbursement (after denials and coinsurance bad debt) vs. CoachCare fees · month 1 carries one-time implementation and Veradigm integration setup (−$3,559); margin turns positive in month two and there is no negative-margin quarter.

24-Month Net Reimbursement Mix

$2.28M total across the RPM + PCM cardiology stack.

The Financial Summary

24-month, by programNet reimb.CoachCare feesPractice margin
RPM$1,557,755$873,485$684,270
PCM$720,575$374,783$345,792
Implementation & ancillary—$58,578−$58,578
Total, 24 months$2,278,330$1,306,846$971,484
By periodNet reimb.CoachCare feesPractice margin
Year 1$616,896$360,654$256,242
Year 2$1,661,434$946,192$715,242
24 months$2,278,330$1,306,846$971,484
Includes an on-site enrollment specialist staffed at CoachCare's expense — embedded value, never subtracted from practice margin.

24-month practice margin: 42.6% of net reimbursement (Year 1 41.5%, Year 2 43.0%). Full model available as a companion workbook. "Active enrollments" counts program enrollments, not unique patients — dual-enrolled patients appear in each program they join; the headline patient figure of 1,253 is deduped.

Scenario Explorer — Build Your Own Forecast

Adjust the assumptions and watch the 24-month forecast recompute live. Census is active program enrollments, not unique patients.
24-mo net reimbursement
$2.28M
24-mo practice margin
$0.97M
Active enrollments at month 24
1,727
Hospitalizations avoided
~113
44,636

Billed Claims / Units

Recurring, subscription-like professional-fee volume over 24 months.

178,496

Physiologic Readings

A continuous clinical picture of the HF, CAD, AFib, and hypertension panels between visits.

~113

Hospitalizations Avoided

≈ $1.70M in avoided acute-care cost at $15K per admission — and 30-day readmission relief for hospital partners.

10.0

FTE-Years Absorbed

~20,894 care-team hours of monitoring, outreach, and documentation handled by CoachCare's clinical staff.

Implementation

Chartered in 30 Days.
Piloting by Day 90.

CoachCare operates as the service line's engine — enrollment outreach, device logistics, 24/7 monitoring, and billing-ready documentation — while Cardiovascular Consultants' physicians govern protocols and every clinical decision. Full-service delivery means launch requires no new practice headcount: the on-site enrollment specialist is CoachCare's hire, and the monitoring load lands on CoachCare's clinical staff, not the practice's medical assistants.

0–30 Days

Charter the Service Line

Named physician champion and P&L; Veradigm integration and billing configuration; PCM principal-condition documentation policy set in protocol; pathway sign-off for HF, CAD, AFib, and hypertension.

31–90 Days

Pilot: Two Anchor Cohorts

Heart failure post-discharge patients and the coumadin/device-clinic panels — the populations already known, already engaged, already generating data.

91–180 Days

Scale Across All Three Offices

Munster, Hammond, and Crown Point all enrolling; post-procedure recovery monitoring live for the interventional and LAA-closure caseload; monthly service-line scorecard in place.

181–365 Days

Extend the Reach

Resistant-hypertension RPM panel building the renal-denervation-readiness funnel; enrollment outreach extended through the seven satellite communities — remote care follows the patients the satellites already serve.

The Proving Ground

Pilot It Where Everything Converges: Munster

The Munster headquarters is the natural pilot site — the practice's highest-volume office, on the campus of its primary hospital partner, steps from where the highest-acuity discharges happen. The coumadin clinic, the device-check clinic, and the physicians who round on those inpatients all work from the same building.

A Munster-first launch concentrates enrollment where discharge volume already flows, lets one office's physicians and staff shake out the workflow, and produces the internal evidence — census, capture rate, revenue per patient-month, readmission signal — that makes the practice-wide rollout a data decision, not a leap.

Scale path: Munster proves it → Hammond and Crown Point join in the second wave → enrollment outreach extends through the satellite communities. Same protocols, same Veradigm configuration, zero re-implementation.

The 90-Day Munster Pilot

Two anchor cohorts: HF post-discharge patients, plus the coumadin and device-clinic panels
MilestoneTarget
Veradigm integration + protocol sign-offDay 30
First billable enrollmentsDay 30–45
48-hour post-discharge outreach rate≥ 90%
7-day post-discharge follow-up rate≥ 70%
Active remote-care enrollments by Day 90*~177
Go / scale decision with full unit economicsDay 90

*The modeled months 1–3 practice-wide enrollment ramp (36 → 95 → 177 active program enrollments), concentrated at the pilot office during the Munster-first phase.

About CoachCare

The Experience to Get It Right

The service line described on this page runs on infrastructure already proven at national scale.

500,000+

Patients Managed

Over 400 conditions managed for 500,000+ patients.

10,000+

Clinicians on the Platform

Providers running remote care programs on CoachCare today.

1,000+

Programs Implemented

Remote care programs implemented for provider organizations.

5M+

Claims Generated

Care-plan coding and billing that has produced over 5 million claims.

100M+

Data at Scale

Over 100 million vitals recorded and 4 million+ care actions.

Policy Watch · CMS-1848-P

2027 Proposed Rule Insights

CMS's CY2027 Physician Fee Schedule proposed rule, published July 16, 2026, proposes to reprice remote physiologic monitoring. Here is what it reaches, what it leaves alone, and how the operating model behind this service line absorbs it.

1

The Proposal Is Confined to RPM

CMS's remote-monitoring proposals sit in one code family: RPM. CCM, PCM, and TCM are not part of them. That distinction lands directly on this forecast — PCM carries $720,575 of the modeled $2,278,330 in 24-month net reimbursement, and the TCM touch at discharge is outside the proposal entirely. Neither is in scope.

2

CoachCare Is Building the Contingencies Now

The delivery model has more than one shape, and CoachCare is preparing each so the service line's economics hold wherever the rule settles. One unbundles the program into its parts — SaaS platform, device logistics, and program enablement — priced as components. Another engages CoachCare to run the staffing itself, an MSO-style arrangement in which the practice owns the clinical program and the billing while CoachCare carries the labor model. Neither requires re-architecting the service line described on this page.

3

ACCESS Moves Remote Care to Risk-Based PMPM

Alongside the fee schedule, CMS's ACCESS Model pays remote care as a risk-based per-member-per-month arrangement rather than per code: recurring per-beneficiary payments, half of each one withheld and reconciled against outcome attainment. Cardiometabolic care is among its four clinical tracks. What earns under that structure — controlled pressures, titrated therapy, decompensations caught early — is what this service line is built to produce.

What the Proposal Actually Takes Off This Forecast

This forecast repriced code by code at CMS's CY2027 proposed values, at this practice's own MAC locality rather than national averages. Same enrollment, same phasing plan — only the rates move.

−20.6%
The headline per-code cut — device supply (99454 / 99445), the code the proposal reprices hardest.
→
−8.9%
The RPM patient-year, because device supply is only 31% of it — the management codes barely move.
→
−6.2%
The whole service line, because PCM carries 31.6% of the forecast and is not in scope.
RPM alone — the only code family in scope$1,557,755 over 24 months
−$139,039
−8.9% of RPM
The whole service line — RPM + PCM$2,278,330 over 24 months
−$140,716
−6.2% of the whole

Both bars run on the same dollar scale, so the red slice is nearly the same width in each — the same dollars, measured against a larger base. The empty track on the top bar is the care-management revenue RPM alone does not include.

RPM, retained at CY2027 proposed rates The proposed reduction PCM — not in scope

Repriced at this locality's own geographic adjusters. The RPM reductions fall almost entirely on practice expense, so the untouched work component carries more weight in some localities than others; the same repricing at national rates would be −8.8% on RPM. Of the $140,716, RPM accounts for $139,039 and the care-management arm for $1,677.

Where the Proposal Lands, Code Family by Code Family

CY2026 versus CMS's published CY2027 proposed values, shown at national non-facility amounts so they can be read against CMS's own tables. This practice's locality-adjusted amounts differ; the repricing above uses the local figures.

Code familyWhat CMS proposedCY2026CY2027 proposedChange
In scope — remote physiologic monitoring
99454 / 99445 · device supplyPractice expense recrosswalked$52.11$41.38−21%
99457 · management, first 20 minDirect practice expense removed$51.77$49.59−4%
99458 · management, each addl 20 minDirect practice expense removed$41.42$40.39−2%
99453 · setup and patient educationCrosswalked; one-time per patient$21.71$20.03−8%
Not in scope — the codes the proposal does not reach
99424–99427 · PCMNo structural change proposed$67.80$67.00−1%
99495 / 99496 · TCMNot addressed by the proposalOutside the remote-monitoring provisions entirely

National non-facility amounts; CY2027 values are CMS's own published proposals in Addendum B of CMS-1848-P. The care-management rows show the lead code in each family; every code in those families moves within about 4% in either direction, which is ordinary annual movement rather than a repricing. The RPM reductions are also phased — section 1848(c)(7) of the Act caps any one code's total-RVU reduction at 19% in a single year, and CMS publishes the affected codes, so CY2027 is a single-digit year for a typical program and the remainder arrives no earlier than CY2028.

None of this is final. CMS-1848-P is a proposed rule. Comments are due September 14, 2026, the final rule is expected in early November, and it takes effect January 1, 2027. CoachCare is leading the advocacy — filing comments, putting the device cost and pricing evidence in front of CMS that the rule itself states the agency does not have, and helping practices file their own. This practice gets the final rates, and the model rerun against them, the week they publish.
Why CoachCare for Cardiovascular Consultants

Built for a Practice That Already Runs Nearly Everything

Six reasons this fits Cardiovascular Consultants specifically, not remote care in general.

Veradigm

We run inside the chart you already use

The Veradigm platform your patients use today is a supported CoachCare integration. Enrollment, vitals, documentation and billing-ready output move between the two systems, so clinicians keep one chart and the billing team keeps one workflow.

Full service

The model that runs without hiring

Enrollment outreach, the care team, device logistics, 24/7 alert triage and billing preparation are CoachCare's payroll. The practice inherits a running program at a 42.6% practice margin with no hiring cycle. On-site enrollment is our expense, because telephonic outreach converts about 8%.

Governance

The practice stays in charge

Seven cardiologists and three advanced practice providers govern the protocols and every clinical decision, and claims go out under the group's own entity. CoachCare supplies the staff, devices and platform under that governance.

Service line

One spine under several levers

The service line runs structured 30-day transitional care after discharge, longitudinal monitoring, and principal care management on one spine. A resistant-hypertension RPM panel is the substrate for renal denervation readiness, documenting the refractory patients the structural and interventional programs already see.

Clean build

No incumbent to unwind

Across the full footprint, from Munster to Winfield, no remote patient monitoring, chronic care management or principal care management is billed today. Nothing has to be unwound, so every enrolled patient is net-new recurring revenue.

Aligned

Paid as you enroll — no capital, no lock-in

Fees are per active patient per month, with no capital outlay and no payroll ramp. Throughput is the lever: if the census does not build, CoachCare does not get paid. The forecast, Disclosures and workbook behind this page are yours to keep either way.

The ask: a working session to validate the panel against your own chart counts, scope the Veradigm interface, and set the go-live for the Munster pilot.